54 Votes in Poll
Well you can see the accuracy and respectfulness in documentaries and books and such. As for the war game talk, I think that can depend on the stories and how one chooses to play those games.
The site if Titanic's final resting place is a burial vault for over one thousand souls. If they can make a "game"out of that why not a "game"for Gettysburg or Arlington?
@Virginia Gobetz They do!
(Also, Battle of Arlington Mill is like, really obscure)
And, burial vaults have bodies in them. Titanic doesn't.
Why not?
As stated above, there are several games about WWI & WWII, about the Vietnam war, about the Chernobyl accident and there are even a few (very obscure) about the Holocaust. So why not about Tiranic?
Are there any stories anyone thinks are too serious for game material?
I think that there shouldn't be games about the Holocaust. Especially since the ones in existence mostly makes the player a German officer.
Other than that... no. Every day life is full of awful incidents and accidents, to some, even surviving is an ordeal! Games copy real life, so why should it be different?
All I said was I don't everything as game material. In fact, Coppola didn't make Godfather for that kinda attention, and I don't blame him for that.
What does "The Godfather" have to do with the Titanic?
Which btw, if Coppola didn't want games to be made out of any if his movies, he shouldn't have signed the contract allowing it!
Not saying that everything should be a game, but you are way too sensitive about the subject of a game about Titanic.
WWII Is way more serious than the Titanic, btw.
Who said he signed the contract? And Godfather, based on what I heard from Hollywood Goes Gaming, was not of interest to him in the first place. As for that sensitivity stuff you're saying, I've got news for you, I don't disagree with you saying the Holocaust isn't game worthy. So why should Titanic be game worthy if not that?
What do you think?